The
British used to think of the region that roughly corresponds to today's
Middle East as two entities: the Near East (the Balkans and the eastern
Mediterranean) and the Middle East (the region around Iran and the
Persian Gulf). By Nick Danforth, based on A. Keith Johnston's 1852
"Chart of the World Showing the Forms and Directions of the Ocean
Currents."
During the 19th century, the British
mentally divided what most of the world now considers the Middle East
into the Near East (the Balkans and the eastern Mediterranean) and the
Middle East (the region around Iran and the Persian Gulf). There was a
certain geographic and strategic logic to this division. The Near East
was, well, nearer than the Middle East, and the Middle East was in the
middle of the Near and Far Easts. For British colonial administrators,
the Middle East was the region that was crucial to the defense of India,
while the Near East was largely under the control of the Ottoman
Empire.This all changed after the Ottoman Empire’s collapse a century ago. The Balkans and then modern Turkey began to seem more Western, while other parts of the Near East came under British control and fell victim to that empire’s bureaucratic reorganization. Winston Churchill, as secretary of state for the colonies, created a “Middle Eastern Department” covering the newly acquired territories of Palestine, Jordan and Iraq. Now this region, too, became part of Britain’s plans for defending its colonial holdings everywhere east of the Suez Canal. In the dramatic words of the historian Roderic Davison, “In this fashion the Middle East burst onto the Mediterranean Coast.”
Richard N. Haass Follow @RichardHaass
Richard N. Haass, President of the
Council on Foreign Relations, previously served as Director of Policy
Planning for the US State Department (2001-2003), and was President
George W. Bush's special envoy to Northern Ireland and Coordinator for
the Future of Afghanistan. His forthcoming book is A Wor… read more
No comments:
Post a Comment